The best Side of natural law cases
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal to your case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment over the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that although the crime of murder was established, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for considering mitigating factors during sentencing.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are on the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are topic to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be thought of, however, we've been obvious within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue to the approval of your competent authority.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature with the petitioner. Read more
The case addresses A variety of issues which includes, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation of the right to life.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice with the loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment about the offender, guaranteeing They are really held accountable for their actions.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other read more courts are obligated to follow.
Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be issue to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
I) The above mentioned referred case FIR, for the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered around the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father with the petitioner and According to story of FIR, the petitioner is an eyewkness in the occurrence.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment with the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres for the doctrine of stare decisis
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]